Kline v. Zimmer, Inc. – Impact on the Legal Landscape of Expert Testimony
Summary
The May 2022 California Court of Appeal case, Kline v. Zimmer, Inc., stands for the general proposition that a defendant may have an expert testify as to possible alternative causes of an injury to rebut a plaintiff’s expert, even if those alternative possible causes do not rise to a reasonable degree of medical certainty. Using examples from their recent trial, Martinez v. Harman Fitness, PSR...Sign Up to View More!